The effect of the decision is that the whole body of worshippers, if they are of one mind, can even permanently remove an idol to another habitation. Process initiated for renting space in some locations, which was discontinued in view of the pending petition, can be restarted at a short notice. Dhebar, for respondent No. The appellate tribunal held that the strike started by the Federation was illegal under s. " Where all the worshippers Supreme Court of India Lawyers a temple, who are in management Supreme Court of India Advocates it, decide to build a new temple, the old one being in ruins and the site on which it stood becoming insanitary and inconvenient for worshippers, then, unless there is clear prohibition against their demolishing the old temple and building a new temple, the Supreme Court lawyers is not entitled to prevent the whole body from removing the temple with its image to a new site in the circumstances.

The relevant portion of this com- munication is in these words: 4 of the Order were however published either on this date or any other date. Space for Principal Bench and other Benches of NCLT, including a special Bench at Delhi to deal with transferred cases of BIFR and AAIFR had also been identified. This objection was overruled. prevention of oppression and mismanagement; revival and rehabilitation of sick companies; winding up and other miscellaneous requirements.

He, however, relied upon certain passages from Purva Thanthiram by Brighu, Kamika Agama, Siddhanta Sekhara and Hayasirsha Pancharatra, and came to the above conclusion. Before going into the merits of the case it is necessary to examine the background and the perspective in which the Act was enacted, the careful inquiry which preceded its enactment and the conditions which the Act was designed to meet. Budget heads have been created for meeting the expenditure for NCLT and NCLAT.

and Berar Press Inquiry Committee constituted on March 27, 1948). We are satisfied that the Bank is not justified in contending that in excluding 136 employees from the responsibility of direct participation in the drafting and publication of the subversive circulars and hand-bills the appellate tribunal has ignored any important evidence. Certain principles were however specified by the Central Government in a communication addressed by the Deputy Secretary to the Government of India dated April 18, 1958, to the Chief Industrial Adviser to the Government of India, New Delhi.

, quoted passages from Kamika Agama, and referred to Prathista Mayukha by Nilakanta, Purva Karana Agamam and Nirnaya Sindhu. The argument that the said finding is opposed to the weight of evidence and as such perverse must therefore be rejected. (iii) Now, from both the Ministries, namely from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs as well as Ministry of Finance, one Member each is included. No principles specified by the Central Government in accordance with cl. (Report of the Press Commission, dated July 14, 1954; Report of the Inquiry Committee constituted in 1947; Report of the C.

Effect of this composition is to make it a five members Selection Committee which was not found to be valid in 2010 judgment. As a result of this decision the dispute was set down for further hearing on the points indicated by it. 7 confers powers on the Controller to enter and search any premises in order to inspect any book or document and to seize any non-ferrous metal in certain circumstances. 25 of 1952) before the Labour Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter called the appellate tribunal), whereas the decision of the tribunal that the 150 employees were not entitled to reinstatement was challenged by the two sets of employees by two different appeals (Nos.

The judgment of the appellate tribunal shows that it first considered the general points and the evidence relied upon by the parties in that behalf; and then it exhaustively dealt with the whole of the evidence bearing on the case of each individual employees. It was urged by the Bank before the appellate tribunal as a preliminary objection that the appeals preferred by the employees were incompetent. It appears that on February 21, 1950, an industrial dispute between the Bank and the Federation had been referred to the arbitration of Mr.

Clauses 5 and 6 of the Order made it obligatory on the importers to notify quantities of non-ferrous metal imported and to maintain certain books of account, while the last clause, i. Allocated funds for 2014-2015 had to be surrendered in view of the delay in settling up the Tribunals. The appellate tribunal recorded its interlocutary decision on September 22, 1952. 24 (1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) (herein- after called the Act).

The direction issued by the tribunal for the payment of the said amount was challenged by the Bank by its appeal (No. The appellate tribunal then proceeded to consider two questions of law, (1) whether an employer has the right to dismiss a workman for his absence from duty by reason of his mere participation in an illegal strike, and (2) if he has, can the tribunal scrutinise the exercise of that right and grant relief to such a workman when it comes to the conclusion that the right has been exercised capriciously or by unfair labour practice.

I (The Union of India) in all the Petitions. This Order was published in the Gazette of India on April 2, 1958.